Category Archives: Health

Pan Caught Lying About Vaccines;

CA Sen. Richard Pan Caught Lying About Vaccines; Massive Recall Effort Now Underway to Kick Him out of Office

NaturalNews Network
NaturalNews.com
August 10th, 2015
1,093 views

24  19  45

panmercuryjokervaccines

The state senator behind California’s SB277 forced vaccination law is a pro at spreading misinformation, particularly on social media.

Carrying out the job that Big Pharma paid him to do — which we recently proved by publishing information about the industry cash he’s received —Senator Richard Pan recently posted a Facebook status citing a completely fraudulent article denying the existence of mercury in vaccines, which also made blatantly false statements about Natural News’Mike Adams.

Written by PolitiFact Georgia‘s April Hunt, the article propagated a multitude of lies including claims that they attempted to contact Adams about his views on mercury in vaccines. Click here for details on the Politifact falsehoods based on either shoddy journalism or a deliberate smear campaign.

In fact, no contact with Adams was ever made by PolitiFact.

PolitiFact‘s claim is a blatant lie, one that Senator Richard Pan repeated in an attempt to attack Adams and distract voters from the fact that hereceived campaign contributions from pharmaceutical companiesbefore promoting the SB277 vaccine mandate in California.

In February 2015, a time when vaccine propaganda reached its peak following the “Disneyland Measles Outbreak,” PolitiFact falsely reported that “Adams declined to speak” with them about “his conclusions regarding mercury” and that he instead referred them to studies on NaturalNews.com. The allegation is blatantly false.

Natural News is demanding not only a retraction but an apology from both PolitiFact GA and Sen. Pan, as both used falsified reports to attempt to smear Adams’ character by insinuating his refusal to stand by his scientific proof that flu shots still contain mercury, a known neurotoxin.

“Who are Pan’s handlers?” asks Adams. “Big drug companies and vaccine manufacturers with deep pockets and a total lack of ethics,” he says. “Richard Pan is a vaccine industry puppet who has betrayed the children of California in exchange for campaign cash from criminal pharmaceutical companies. If he stays in office, he presents a clear and present danger to all children and families in California… but especially African-American children whom a top CDC scientist has already admitted have a higher risk of autism stemming from vaccinations.”

It’s very important that the general public understands the tactics that Sen. Pan is using to push mandatory vaccination in California, which brainwash the public into believing that vaccines have no risks, only benefits.

You can view videos about vaccine injuries atStopMandatoryVaccination.com.

View Richard Pan’s Facebook page at this link.

Californians seek to boot Senator Pan from office

Enraged over the forced vaccination bill recently pushed through by Sen. Pan, Californians have had enough and are actively trying to have him removed from office through a recall.

To kick Pan out of office, proponents will need to collect 35,926 signatures by the end of December, before convincing a majority of voters that there is sufficient cause to depose a man they elevated to the state Senate mere months ago,” reports The Sacramento Bee.

California’s last successful recall occurred in 2003 when voters unseated Gov. Gray Davis, replacing him with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Pan’s track record is less than admirable. He very well may have broken the law when he discouraged people from signing the SB277 Referendumby quoting from an article saying “Whatever you do, don’t sign it” and posting it on his Facebook page.

The SB277 Referendum could potentially reverse forced vaccination in California; learn where to sign here.

California law clearly states that “interference in a recall or referendum effort” is strictly prohibited.

You can help pressure Attorney General Kamala D. Harris to act by tweeting her at@CalAGHarris. Supporters of #SB277Referendum can also bring awareness to this issue by using #CanPan on Twitter.

Senator Pan is a walking advertisement for Big Pharma

To say Pan’s position on vaccines is biased would be a severeunderstatement, as he received more than $95,000 from Big Pharmaduring the 2013-2014 legislative session. He also accepted donations from Merck & Co. in the 2010 election cycle, in which the pharmaceutical industry was buying politicians and strategically placing them in positions that would guarantee the passing of their sinister vaccine mandate.

The idea that Sen. Pan is a “public health advocate” is outrageous. Terms like these are often used by big government and large corporations to try and trick the public, by assigning a name or title that sounds really great and wonderful when in all actuality the complete opposite is true.

Take for example the “Patriot Act,” which severely infringes on Americans’ rights, or the “Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act,” which sounds really good but aims to prohibit individual states from labeling GMOs and enacting laws limiting the use of toxic glyphosate on crops.

Another example is the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA), which as The Hilldescribes, “is an out and out surveillance bill masquerading as a cybersecurity bill.”

This is true in Pan’s case, as he is not really a “public health advocate” but a purchased advertisement for vaccines. He doesn’t seem to care whether or not vaccines are safe. All he cares about is making sure he posts enough pro-vaccine social media propaganda to meet whatever quota he and Big Pharma likely agreed upon.

Pan’s Twitter page goes something like this:

Going away to college? Don’t forget to get your vaccines! #VaccinesWork

Thinking about going out of the country? Don’t forget to take your vaccines! #VaccinesWork

Nine months pregnant and about to give birth? Don’t forget to take your vaccines! #VaccinesWork

Considering that the vaccine industry has paid out over $3 billion to vaccine-injured families since 1986, this type of advertising by a state senator is unethical, dangerous and undemocratic.

Keep checking back with Natural News as we continue to follow the#CanPan campaign as well as the petition to reverse #SB277, which you can find out more about here!

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

Advertisements

Hillary’s Benghazi

Hillary’s Secret War—–The Smoking Guns Of Benghazi

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInPrint this pageEmail this to someone

In the course of my work at Fox News, I am often asked by colleagues to review and explain documents and statutes. Recently, in conjunction with my colleagues Catherine Herridge, our chief intelligence correspondent, and Pamela Browne, our senior executive producer, I read the transcripts of an interview Browne did with a man named Marc Turi, and Herridge asked me to review emails to and from State Department and congressional officials during the years when Hillary Clinton was the secretary of state.

What I saw has persuaded me beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty that Clinton provided material assistance to terrorists and lied to Congress in a venue where the law required her to be truthful. Here is the backstory.

Turi is a lawfully licensed American arms dealer. In 2011, he applied to the Departments of State and Treasury for approvals to sell arms to the government of Qatar. Qatar is a small Middle Eastern country whose government is so entwined with the U.S. government that it almost always will do what American government officials ask of it.

In its efforts to keep arms from countries and groups that might harm Americans and American interests, Congress has authorized the Departments of State and Treasury to be arms gatekeepers. They can declare a country or group to be a terrorist organization, in which case selling or facilitating the sale of arms to them is a felony. They also can license dealers to sell.

Turi sold hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of arms to the government of Qatar, which then, at the request of American government officials, were sold, bartered or given to rebel groups in Libya and Syria. Some of the groups that received the arms were on the U.S. terror list. Thus, the same State and Treasury Departments that licensed the sales also prohibited them.

How could that be?

That’s where Clinton’s secret State Department and her secret war come in. Because Clinton used her husband’s computer server for all of her email traffic while she was the secretary of state, a violation of three federal laws, few in the State Department outside her inner circle knew what she was up to.

Now we know.

She obtained permission from President Obama and consent from congressional leaders in both houses of Congress and in both parties to arm rebels in Syria and Libya in an effort to overthrow the governments of those countries.

Many of the rebels Clinton armed, using the weapons lawfully sold to Qatar by Turi and others, were terrorist groups who are our sworn enemies. There was no congressional declaration of war, no congressional vote, no congressional knowledge beyond fewer than a dozen members, and no federal statute that authorized this.

When Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., asked Clinton at a public hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Jan. 23, 2013, whether she knew about American arms shipped to the Middle East, to Turkey or to any other country, she denied any knowledge. It is unclear whether she was under oath at the time, but that is legally irrelevant. The obligation to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth to Congress pertains to all witnesses who testify before congressional committees, whether an oath has been administered or not. (Just ask Roger Clemens, who was twice prosecuted for misleading Congress about the contents of his urine while not under oath. He was acquitted.)

Here is her relevant testimony.

Paul: My question is … is the U.S. involved with any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons … buying, selling … anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey … out of Libya?

Clinton: To Turkey? … I will have to take that question for the record. Nobody’s ever raised that with me. I, I…

Paul: It’s been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and that they may have weapons … and what I’d like to know is … the (Benghazi) annex that was close by… Were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons … and were any of these weapons transferred to other countries … any countries, Turkey included?

Clinton: Senator, you will have to direct that question to the agency that ran the (Benghazi) annex. And I will see what information is available and … ahhhh…

Paul: You are saying you don’t know…

Clinton: I do not know. I don’t have any information on that.

At the time that Clinton denied knowledge of the arms shipments, she and her State Department political designee Andrew Shapiro had authorized thousands of shipments of billions of dollars’ worth of arms to U.S. enemies to fight her secret war. Among the casualties of her war were U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three colleagues, who were assassinated at the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, by rebels Clinton armed with American military hardware in violation of American law.

This secret war and the criminal behavior that animated it was the product of conspirators in the White House, the State Department, the Treasury Department, the Justice Department, the CIA and a tight-knit group of members of Congress. Their conspiracy has now unraveled. Where is the outrage among the balance of Congress?

Hillary Clinton lied to Congress, gave arms to terrorists and destroyed her emails. How much longer can she hide the truth? How much longer can her lawlessness go unchallenged and unprosecuted? Does she really think the American voters will overlook her criminal behavior and put her in the White House where she can pardon herself?

Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel. Judge Napolitano has written seven books on the U.S. Constitution. The most recent is Suicide Pact: The Radical Expansion of Presidential Powers and the Lethal Threat to American Liberty. To find out more about Judge Napolitano and to read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit http://www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2014 ANDREW P. NAPOLITANO – DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

Super Tasty Smoothie

Super Tasty Smoothie

You will both love how it tastes !!!

1 cup pineapple, fresh or canned
1 banana, frozen
1 cup apple juice
1/2 tsp ginger
1/2 tsp cinnamon
1/4 tsp nutmeg
1/2 tsp vanilla extract
2 TBS honey
Optional ingredients: 1 raw egg white, 2 TBS wheat germ, 2 TBS flax seed, 1 shot wheatgrass juice

Chocolate Diet

The study that claimed chocolate helps you lose weight? It’s fake

Published: May 29, 2015

 ‘Healthy’ food advice often based on questionable science

Everett Collection

Eat chocolate and lose weight? That’s the best news I’ve heard all day!

Coffee is good for your heart. Red wine helps you live longer. And the latest scientific claim: Chocolate helps you lose weight. One caveat: It’s based on terrible science.

press release on March 29 made a promise that newspapers and magazines around the world would repeat: “Can you indulge your sweet tooth and lose weight at the same time? If it’s chocolate you crave, then the answer seems to be: yes.” Lead author “Johannes Bohannon,” research director of the nonprofit Institute of Diet and Health, said, “Just lowering the proportion of carbohydrates is not a reliable weight loss intervention because it has different physiological effects depending on the bioactive compounds in your diet.”

Sure, losing weight with the help of a daily dose of chocolate does sound too good to be true…but it seemed scientific. The researchers divided subjects aged 19 to 67 into three groups: One group followed a strict low-carbohydrate diet, another group followed the low-carbohydrate diet and also consumed 42 grams of dark (81%) chocolate per day, and a control group followed their status quo diet. The low-carb group lost weight compared to the control group, but the low-carb plus chocolate group lost 10% more weight. The chocolate group also reported better sleep and well-being, and their blood cholesterol levels were significantly reduced.

Now the reality.

Johannes Bohannon is John Bohannon, a journalist, and the study was actually commissioned by German TV producers making a show about the junk-science diet industry. The Institute of Diet and Health was a website. The study had only 15 participants and included 18 different measurements, including weight, cholesterol, sodium, blood protein levels — a recipe for false positives, Bohannon says. “It was, in fact, a fairly typical study for the field of diet research,” he says. “Which is to say: It was terrible science. The results are meaningless.”

Don’t be fooled by junk-science diet industry

(3:49)A fake study about chocolate and weight loss illustrates the dangers of not looking closely at how studies are conducted.

“Other than those fibs, the study was 100% authentic,” he writes of his exposé. The sloppy science and its appealing conclusions got headlines in the Daily Star, Huffington Post, Irish Examiner, Daily Express and was on the front page of the German tabloid Bild. Subjects in the clinical trial were assigned different diet regimes, and the statistically significant results were based on the actual data. “Here’s a dirty little science secret: If you measure a large number of things about a small number of people, you are almost guaranteed to get a ‘statistically significant’ result.”

Read: How diet soda can sabotage your diet

The diet industry gulls people into believing that certain products produce weight loss, when even the science shows the opposite, says Gary Ruskin, executive director of U.S. Right to Know, a consumer advocacy group. But he is concerned by the number of studies that suggest surprising ways to lose weight, and says people should read the actual study and, given the infinite amount of variables, take them with a grain of salt. “So many studies are designed to produce a result that is favorable to a manufacturer,” he says. “Science journalism blasts out what food and diet companies say as fact with far too little scrutiny.”

Last June, Mehmet Oz, more commonly known as “Dr. Oz,” appeared before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee to defend calling weight-loss products “miracles” or “lightning in a bottle” on his show. The British Medical Journal found that evidence supported just 46% of medical products recommended on his show. (”To not have the conversation about supplements at all however would be a disservice to the viewer,” Oz said in a prepared statement after appearing at the hearing. He also told Congress he had used “very passionate” language that “provided fodder for unscrupulous advertisers.”)

Headlines often don’t tell the full story. This 2010 Reuters headline “Wine may help women keep weight in check” was based on a study in the JAMA Internal Medicine, a peer-reviewed medical journal published by the American Medical Association. One caveat: The women who consumed more alcohol also ate fewer carbohydrates. And this Daily Telegraph headline, “Glass of wine with dinner helps you live longer,” was based on a 2014 Czech study, presented at the European Society of Cardiology Congress in Barcelona. The results were only positive in those who exercised.

And this recent headline, “Another reason to drink coffee: It’s good for your heart, study says” in the Los Angeles Times was drawn from a study of over 28,000 men and women published in the journal Heart, the official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society. “Moderate coffee consumption was associated with a lower prevalence of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis,” it found. Like all studies, the results show a correlation — not a causation — and drinking more than five cups of coffee a day was associated with higher levels of coronary atherosclerosis, a bad end result for coffee addicts.

Vaccine Data Dissapears

Attkisson: Feds WipedVaccine Injury Data From Website

“[N]o longer reflects the recent, sharp rise…”

Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson is reportingthat data related to the recent rise in cases regarding injury or death from vaccines has suddenly been wiped from a Department of Health and Human Services agency website — amounting to what Attkisson calls “an abrupt departure from the normal practice of updating the figures monthly.”

As previously reported by TruthRevolt, Attkisson is doubtful of the mainstream media’s conclusion that the science is settled over there being no link between autism and vaccines, nor is she completely convinced that there is one. Her goal seems to be to continually seek answers regarding this topic and has now set her sights on the recent scrubbing of information by the federal government.

She reports:

In March, the federal government removed the latest vaccine injury court statistics—more than a year’s worth of data—from one of its publicly reported charts. It was an abrupt departure from the normal practice of updating the figures monthly.

Wiping the latest data means the “adjudication” chart on a government website no longer reflects the recent, sharp rise in court victories for plaintiffs who claimed their children were seriously injured or killed by one or more vaccines.

According to Attkisson, there have been twice as many cases (“up 55%”) since the beginning of 2014 where a judge has ruled that vaccines “more likely than not” injured the plaintiff. This is the data Attkisson says has now been deleted from their statistics chart.

Billionaires Shocked To Learn They Only Control Half The World’s Wealth

Billionaires Shocked To Learn They Only Control Half The World’s Wealth

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 01/20/2015 14:55 -0500

Satirically brought to you by The New Yorker’s Borowitz Report,

A new Oxfam report indicating that the wealthiest one per cent possesses about half of the world’s wealth has left the richest people in the world “reeling with disappointment,” a leading billionaire said on Tuesday.

 

Speaking to reporters in Davos, Switzerland, where he is attending the World Economic Forum, the hedge-find owner Harland Dorrinson said, “I think I speak for a lot of my fellow billionaires when I say I thought we were doing a good deal better than that.”

 

Calling the Oxfam findings “sobering,” he said that he hoped they would serve “as a wake-up call to billionaires everywhere that it’s time to up our game.”

 

“Quite frankly, a lot of us thought that by buying politicians, rewriting tax laws, and hiding money overseas, we were getting it done,” said Dorrinson, who owns the hedge fund Garrote Capital. “If, at the end of the day, all we control is a measly half of the world’s wealth, clearly we need to do more—much more.”

 

In Davos, Dorrinson is huddling with other billionaires in the hopes of setting an ambitious goal for the top one per cent: to own the other half of the world’s wealth by 2025.

 

While he considers this target “doable,” Dorrinson said that he does not underestimate the challenge of wresting the other half from the “vise-like grip” of the approximately seven billion people who comprise the bottom ninety-nine per cent.

 

“Getting that other half is not going to be a walk in the park,” he said. “But ten years from now, when Oxfam says that the top one per cent owns everything in the world, it’ll all have been worth it.”

*  *  *

Average:

BOMBSHELL: CDC Whistleblower Who Admitted Covering Up MMR Vaccine

BOMBSHELL: CDC Whistleblower Who Admitted Covering Up MMR Vaccine Links to Autism Granted Immunity, Will Testify

Lily Dane
The Daily Sheeple
February 4th, 2015
Reader Views: 196

2  1  3

whistleblower

Flashback to late August 2014:

Shocking revelations about alleged CDC misconduct in a study investigating the link between autism and vaccines have been made even worse by an active campaign to censor and silence the issue in the media.

That CDC whistleblower is back in the news (in the alternative, independent news, anyway).

We’ll get to why in a minute.

First, here’s some background:

In 2004, Dr. William S. Thompson worked on a report for the CDC’s National Immunization Program. That report, which ran in the “Pediatrics” medical journal, came to the conclusion that there’s no link between vaccines and autism and that no racial group is more likely to be damaged by vaccines.

But Thompson said that he and other CDC scientists intentionally fudged the results, manipulating the pool of children they analyzed and limiting the proper number of African-American children from participating. The authors limited black children from showing up in the results by excluding babies without a state of Georgia birth certificate.

(source)

Dr. Thompson came clean during the course of several conversations with Dr. Brian Hooker, who is a researcher (PhD in Bioengineering) and the father of a vaccine-injured child.

From Health Impact News:

Dr. Hooker has fought against the CDC for more than 12 years, using the Freedom of Information Act to try and gather as much data as he could from the studies that the CDC has published that claim there is no link between vaccines and autism. He has submitted much of the results of his own internal investigation of the CDC data on vaccines and autism to Congress. Congressman Bill Posey has assisted him in forcing the CDC to comply with many of these requests.

After almost 12 years, his tireless pursuit of finding the truth that the CDC was hiding paid off, as the CDC finally handed over documents so that Dr. Hooker could look at the raw data that the CDC used to claim that there was no link between vaccines and autism. It took some Congressional pressure from Congressman Bill Posey to get this information.

The mainstream media scrambled to discredit Dr. Thompson. The few reports that made it to mainstream news sites were quickly pulled (two of which were on CNN). Most mainstream sites didn’t touch the story (surprise, surprise), but an article that was posted on Yahoo! Finance received quite a bit of attention.

Now, here’s why this story is back in the news: it is being reported that the Obama administration has granted Dr. Thompson official whistleblower status and immunity. This will allow him to testify before Congress about CDC fraud regarding vaccine safety and to explain the thousands of documents that have been turned over to congressional representatives, reportsVaxTruth.org.

So, now, we wait for that hearing.

What will come of it? It’s hard to say at this point, but take a look at the updated study (this is the study the whistleblower is affiliated with):

Study published on PubMed on August 8, 2014:

Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young African American boys: a reanalysis of CDC data.

RESULTS:  When comparing cases and controls receiving their first MMR vaccine before and after 36 months of age, there was a statistically significant increase in autism cases specifically among African American males who received the first MMR prior to 36 months of age. Relative risks for males in general and African American males were 1.69 (p=0.0138) and 3.36 (p=0.0019), respectively. Additionally, African American males showed an odds ratio of 1.73 (p=0.0200) for autism cases in children receiving their first MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age versus 24 months of age and thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides new epidemiologic evidence showing that African American males receiving the MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age or 36 months of age are more likely to receive an autism diagnosis.

The CDC continues to insist that a link between vaccines and autism doesn’t exist, but…last month, they quietly launched a robo-call AND Twitter campaign to ask people for their input on the health impacts of vaccines.

Patrick Howley of The Daily Caller reported on the campaign:

The Centers For Disease Control and Prevention is making recorded calls to private cell phone users for research on the health effects of vaccines.

CDC gets people’s phone numbers from the Department of Motor Vehicles and other government agencies.

CDC is using the information for a government study on the matter as the social media campaign#CDCWhistleblower explodes on Twitter with stories and accusations from whistleblowers alleging that childhood Hepatitis vaccines have harmed children. The campaign has received no national media attention until now.

Childhood Hepatitis vaccines have been blamed by many for the preponderance of autism and other neurological disorders in children, despite no official government-recognized study confirming the longstanding suspicion by parents and advocates. All 50 states require some vaccinations for young children. The CDC childhood vaccine schedule dates back to 1983 and grew consistently through the mid-’90s.

Mr. Howley asked a CDC employee about the autism issue and was told:

“As far as autism goes, [the government] does not find associations between vaccines and autism.” The CDC employee said the study was not specifically about autism.

The #CDCWhistleblower Twitter campaign began nearly a month ago, and is still being flooded with Tweets. They are coming in so fast that I couldn’t keep up with them at the time of this writing.

Will there actually be a CDC whistleblower hearing before Congress? If so, what will Dr. Thompson reveal?

– See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/bombshell-cdc-whistleblower-who-admitted-covering-up-mmr-vaccine-links-to-autism-granted-immunity-will-testify_022015#sthash.T5YoVaa1.dpuf